Snowflake DISTINCT Subquery Hidden Performance Wins

Data teams running Snowflake queries sometimes encounter performance opportunities they haven’t fully optimized. Queries take longer than expected. Memory usage increases. Warehouse costs rise.

The reason? Subqueries returning duplicate rows that could be deduplicated for better efficiency.

A single subquery can balloon your result set by orders of magnitude. Without proper deduplication, Snowflake processes the same customer ID thousands of times, the same transaction record repeatedly, the same dimensional value endlessly. This repetitive processing burns through memory, maxes out warehouse capacity, and drives up compute costs.

The solution isn’t complex infrastructure changes. It’s strategic use of DISTINCT and aggregation in your Snowflake DISTINCT subquery operations.

Understanding Subquery Duplicate Row Impact

Snowflake’s architecture separates storage and compute, allowing massive scalability. This design excels at processing large datasets, but it amplifies the cost of inefficiency.

When a Snowflake DISTINCT subquery returns duplicate rows, the outer query must process every single duplicate. A subquery that should return 10,000 unique customer IDs might instead return 5 million rows with extensive duplication.

The impact cascades:

• Snowflake loads all those duplicate rows from storage into warehouse compute nodes
• Memory fills with redundant data
• Join operations explode as the same values match repeatedly
• Aggregations process identical records multiple times
• Straightforward lookups become resource-intensive operations

Memory usage takes the first hit. Each duplicate row consumes warehouse memory. When available memory fills, Snowflake spills to local disk. If local disk capacity proves insufficient, the system spills to remote storage.

That kills performance.

A query running in seconds with proper memory management can take hours when constantly shuffling data to remote storage. Compute costs follow memory problems. Snowflake charges based on warehouse runtime and size, so inefficient Snowflake DISTINCT subquery operations extend execution time and directly increase your credit consumption.

A warehouse sized for typical workloads suddenly runs out of capacity. Teams respond by scaling up warehouse size, compounding the cost impact. The real issue wasn’t insufficient compute power – it was processing millions of unnecessary duplicate rows.

Network data transfer suffers too. Snowflake’s distributed architecture moves data between compute nodes to execute queries. Duplicate rows multiply the volume of data shuffled across the network, adding latency to every operation. The query optimizer works harder with bloated intermediate result sets, potentially choosing suboptimal execution paths because it’s dealing with datasets far larger than necessary.

The DISTINCT Solution for Subquery Optimization

The DISTINCT keyword in a Snowflake DISTINCT subquery eliminates duplicate rows before passing results to the outer query. Simple. Effective. Powerful.

Instead of processing millions of duplicate customer IDs, the outer query receives only unique values. Memory requirements drop dramatically. Join operations become straightforward lookups rather than combinatorial explosions.

Consider a common pattern: finding all orders for customers who made high-value transactions. Without DISTINCT, the subquery returns one row for every qualifying transaction. A customer with 50 large transactions appears 50 times in the subquery result.

The outer query then attempts to match orders against this bloated dataset, creating a join explosion scenario.

-- Inefficient: Returns duplicate customer_id values
SELECT *
FROM orders o
WHERE o.customer_id IN (
    SELECT customer_id 
    FROM large_transaction_table
    WHERE amount > 1000
);

The warehouse processes every duplicate. Memory fills unnecessarily. The query optimizer works with cardinality estimates based on the subquery result set size, and when this doesn’t reflect actual distinct values, execution plans may not be optimal. Query performance degrades proportionally to the duplication factor in your data.

Adding DISTINCT transforms this operation:

-- Optimized: Returns only distinct customer_id values
SELECT *
FROM orders o
WHERE o.customer_id IN (
    SELECT DISTINCT customer_id 
    FROM large_transaction_table
    WHERE amount > 1000
);

The Snowflake DISTINCT subquery now returns each customer_id exactly once, regardless of how many qualifying transactions they have. The outer query’s IN clause performs clean, efficient lookups. Memory usage aligns with actual distinct customer count, not transaction volume.

The performance difference can be staggering. A subquery that previously returned 5 million rows might reduce to 50,000 distinct values – a 100x reduction in data volume.

Memory consumption drops proportionally. Join operations complete faster. The query optimizer generates better execution plans because cardinality estimates actually reflect reality.

When to use DISTINCT:

• Simple deduplication scenarios where you need exactly one instance of each value
• No additional computations required beyond uniqueness
• Cleanest syntax for communicating intent
• Query optimizer can apply specific optimizations for DISTINCT operations

The operation carries computational cost – Snowflake must identify and eliminate duplicates, which requires sorting or hashing. However, this cost is typically minor compared to the expense of processing millions of duplicate rows in subsequent query operations.

You pay a small price in the subquery to achieve massive savings in the outer query.

GROUP BY Aggregation for Advanced Deduplication

GROUP BY offers an alternative to DISTINCT in Snowflake DISTINCT subquery scenarios, with additional flexibility.

While DISTINCT simply eliminates duplicates, GROUP BY enables aggregation alongside deduplication. This dual capability proves valuable when you need both unique values and summary statistics about those values.

The basic GROUP BY deduplication pattern looks nearly identical to DISTINCT:

-- Using GROUP BY for deduplication
SELECT *
FROM orders o
WHERE o.customer_id IN (
    SELECT customer_id 
    FROM large_transaction_table
    WHERE amount > 1000
    GROUP BY customer_id
);

This achieves the same deduplication as DISTINCT. Each customer_id appears once in the subquery result. Memory usage remains controlled. For straightforward deduplication, DISTINCT and GROUP BY perform similarly in Snowflake, and you can choose based on code clarity preferences.

GROUP BY’s real power emerges when you need aggregated values.

Suppose you want orders for customers whose average transaction exceeds a threshold. DISTINCT can’t calculate averages – it only eliminates duplicates. GROUP BY handles both deduplication and aggregation in a single operation:

-- GROUP BY enables filtering on aggregated values
SELECT *
FROM orders o
WHERE o.customer_id IN (
    SELECT customer_id 
    FROM large_transaction_table
    WHERE amount > 1000
    GROUP BY customer_id
    HAVING AVG(amount) > 5000
);

You’ve simultaneously deduplicated customer_id values and filtered based on their average transaction amount. This consolidates operations that would otherwise require multiple query steps or complex subquery nesting.

The Snowflake DISTINCT subquery using GROUP BY maintains memory efficiency while providing analytical capabilities.

Another GROUP BY advantage appears in multi-column scenarios:

When deduplicating across multiple columns, GROUP BY syntax often reads more clearly than DISTINCT. If you need unique combinations of customer_id and region:

SELECT customer_id, region
FROM large_transaction_table
WHERE amount > 1000
GROUP BY customer_id, region;

This explicitly shows which columns define uniqueness. The query optimizer understands exactly which columns participate in deduplication, enabling better execution planning. For complex queries with numerous columns, this clarity helps both humans reading the code and Snowflake’s optimizer generating execution plans.

Performance characteristics between DISTINCT and GROUP BY in basic deduplication scenarios are comparable. Snowflake’s query optimizer often generates similar execution plans for equivalent queries.

The choice primarily affects code readability and whether you need aggregation capabilities. When aggregation isn’t required, DISTINCT communicates intent more directly. When you’re computing aggregate values anyway, GROUP BY eliminates redundant operations.

Memory Usage Optimization Through Deduplication

Memory management separates efficient Snowflake operations from cost disasters.

When a Snowflake DISTINCT subquery returns millions of duplicate rows, those rows consume warehouse memory. Each warehouse size has fixed memory capacity – small warehouses have less, large warehouses more, but all have limits.

Exceed available memory and Snowflake begins spilling operations to disk.

Local disk spillage happens first. Snowflake writes intermediate query results to the warehouse’s local SSD storage when memory fills. This introduces I/O overhead but remains relatively fast compared to alternatives. Queries slow down but still complete in reasonable timeframes. You’ll see increased execution time but not catastrophic degradation.

Remote spillage significantly impacts performance. When both memory and local disk capacity are exhausted, Snowflake spills to remote cloud storage. This requires network transfers to write data out and read it back. Network latency dominates execution time. Queries that should take seconds stretch into minutes or hours.

A Snowflake DISTINCT subquery that causes remote spillage can increase query costs by orders of magnitude.

Proper deduplication prevents these spillage scenarios. Consider a subquery joining two large tables without DISTINCT – the intermediate result might contain 100 million rows with 95% duplication. This massive dataset overwhelms warehouse memory, triggers local spillage, potentially causes remote spillage. The outer query then processes this bloated result set, amplifying the problem.

Add DISTINCT to that Snowflake DISTINCT subquery and the dynamics change completely.

The deduplicated result drops to 5 million rows – still substantial but fitting comfortably in memory for appropriately sized warehouses. No spillage occurs. The query executes entirely in memory, leveraging Snowflake’s optimized in-memory processing.

Execution time drops dramatically. Compute costs align with actual work performed rather than inefficiency overhead.

Memory efficiency also improves cache utilization:

• Snowflake maintains result caches to accelerate repeated queries
• When a query’s intermediate results fit in memory, they’re more likely to be cached effectively
• Subsequent similar queries benefit from this caching
• Bloated result sets from un-deduplicated subqueries consume cache space inefficiently
• Proper Snowflake DISTINCT subquery practices improve overall warehouse cache performance

The query optimizer generates better plans when memory usage remains controlled. Excessive memory pressure causes the optimizer to choose more conservative execution strategies – sometimes sacrificing speed for memory safety.

Queries that consistently operate within memory bounds allow the optimizer to select aggressive, high-performance execution paths. This creates a virtuous cycle where efficient queries enable further optimization.

Compute Cost Reduction and Warehouse Sizing

Snowflake’s consumption-based pricing model makes query efficiency directly impact your costs.

You pay for warehouse runtime measured in compute credits. A warehouse running for one hour costs X credits. That same warehouse processing inefficient queries might run for two hours, doubling your costs. Snowflake DISTINCT subquery optimization reduces runtime, cutting credit consumption proportionally.

The cost impact compounds when teams respond to slow queries by scaling warehouse size.

An X-Small warehouse costs 1 credit per hour. Large warehouses cost 8 credits per hour – an 8x multiplier. If inefficient Snowflake DISTINCT subquery operations make queries slow on smaller warehouses, teams naturally upgrade to larger sizes seeking acceptable performance.

This addresses the symptom while ignoring the root cause.

Proper subquery deduplication often eliminates the need for oversized warehouses. Queries that struggled on Medium warehouses suddenly run smoothly on Small or even X-Small configurations after optimization. You’re processing dramatically less data, requiring proportionally less compute power.

Instead of paying 4 credits per hour for a Medium warehouse, you pay 1 credit per hour for X-Small – a 75% cost reduction for identical workload.

The cost benefits extend beyond warehouse size to runtime:

• A query that takes 10 minutes on an inefficient Snowflake DISTINCT subquery might complete in 2 minutes after optimization
• That’s an 80% runtime reduction
• For warehouses running hundreds of queries daily, these optimizations aggregate into substantial savings
• A team running 500 queries daily, each saving 5 minutes, recovers over 40 hours of warehouse runtime monthly

Auto-suspend and auto-resume features amplify these benefits. Snowflake warehouses automatically suspend after a configured idle period, stopping credit consumption. Efficient queries complete faster, allowing warehouses to suspend sooner.

Inefficient queries keep warehouses active longer, delaying suspension and increasing costs. Optimizing your Snowflake DISTINCT subquery operations accelerates the path to suspension, maximizing idle time cost savings.

Multi-cluster warehouses introduce another cost dimension. When query concurrency demands exceed single-cluster capacity, additional clusters automatically spawn. Each cluster consumes credits independently.

Inefficient queries that take 10 minutes occupy cluster resources longer than optimized queries completing in 2 minutes. Longer-running queries increase concurrency pressure, triggering additional cluster spawning more frequently. Optimized queries reduce concurrency demands, minimizing cluster scaling and associated costs.

Enterprise teams often operate multiple warehouses for different workloads. Development, testing, production analytics, ad-hoc exploration – each environment costs money. Inefficient Snowflake DISTINCT subquery patterns multiply across all these environments.

Optimization applied once propagates to every warehouse running those queries, creating multiplicative cost savings across your entire Snowflake deployment.

How Unravel’s Data Engineering Agent Automates Query Optimization

Traditional Snowflake monitoring identifies inefficient queries but leaves implementation entirely manual. You see the problem. You understand the fix.

But someone still needs to rewrite the SQL, test the changes, and deploy optimizations.

Unravel’s Data Engineering Agent eliminates this gap by moving from insight to automated action.

Built natively on Snowflake System Tables, the Data Engineering Agent requires no agents, no data extraction, and no external infrastructure. It analyzes query patterns directly within your Snowflake environment using Delta Sharing or Direct Share, maintaining complete data security.

The agent monitors every query execution, identifies inefficient Snowflake DISTINCT subquery operations, and determines where DISTINCT or GROUP BY would improve performance.

You control exactly how much automation to enable:

Level 1 – Recommendations: The agent identifies inefficient Snowflake DISTINCT subquery patterns and recommends optimizations. You review and approve each change manually. Perfect for building confidence.

Level 2 – Auto-Approve Specific Types: Enable automatic implementation for proven, low-risk optimizations like subquery deduplication. The agent applies these fixes without manual intervention while still requiring approval for complex changes.

Level 3 – Full Automation with Guardrails: Set governance policies and let the agent continuously optimize within those boundaries. Problems get fixed immediately, not added to backlog queues.

Teams using Unravel’s Data Engineering Agent achieve 25-35% sustained cost reduction and eliminate hundreds of hours of manual query tuning work. Engineers focus on building features while the agent handles performance optimization automatically.

Traditional monitoring tools stop at insights. They tell you a query is slow. They might even identify the problematic Snowflake DISTINCT subquery pattern.

But they leave implementation entirely in your hands – rewrite the SQL, test it, deploy it, hope it works.

Unravel’s Data Engineering Agent doesn’t just identify the issue. It rewrites the query, validates the optimization, and implements the fix based on your governance settings.

From insight to action, automatically.

The agent works across your entire query inventory. It doesn’t just optimize the queries causing obvious problems today. It proactively identifies queries that will become problems as data volumes grow. A Snowflake DISTINCT subquery that performs adequately now might degrade as transaction tables expand.

The agent catches these patterns early and optimizes before performance deteriorates.

Other Useful Links

• Our Snowflake Optimization Platform
• Get a Free Snowflake Health Check
• Check out other Snowflake Resources