The checks you'd expect. The intelligence you wouldn't.
Freshness
Volume
Schema drift
Distribution
Custom SQL checks
Reconciliation
Lineage-aware impact
Quality SLAs
What's different

Watch the data. Diagnose the cause. Resolve it.

Other tools stop at the alert. Unravel correlates, explains, and fixes — autonomously when you let it.

Arvix in Action

One alert. One workload view. One platform deciding what to do.

A quality alert today kicks off a 40-minute scavenger hunt. With Unravel, the alert opens an incident view that already has the answer.

——— Why this matters now

Your AI is only as good as the data feeding it.

Stale training data, drifting features, RAG sources gone light — these don't break loudly. They quietly degrade the model until the answer is wrong. Unravel watches the data behind every AI workload.

Silent failure mode
Stale training data
Feature pipeline misses a refresh. Training runs on yesterday's reality. Model ships, accuracy drops, no one paged.
Silent failure mode
RAG retrieval gaps
Embedding source volume drops overnight. Chatbot answers from incomplete context. Customers notice before you do.
Silent failure mode
Distribution drift
Input distribution shifts a few percent a week. Inference quality decays smoothly. By the time a metric moves, you've lost a quarter.
Arvix
Watches every table, check, and pipeline feeding your AI — and flags the moment data trust breaks. Not three weeks later when the metric finally moves.
Bring your own DQ

Keep what works. Make it smarter.

Standardized on Great Expectations? Heavy in Informatica? dbt tests, Soda, custom SQL? All of it flows in.

Informatica
Great Expectations
dbt tests
Soda
Custom SQL

One incident. Every signal. One platform deciding what to do about it.

Where pure-play DQ stops

They watch the data. They don't see the system around it.

The cause of a quality incident is almost never in the table. It's upstream — in the code, the compute, the config that ran the night before.

DQ-only tools
No performance correlation

They see the row drop. They can't see the failed Spark stage or OOM that caused it. Unravel does.

DQ-only tools
No cost correlation

They tell you the data's wrong. Not what the bad pipeline cost — or what the backfill will. Unravel quantifies both.

DQ-only tools
Alert. Don't fix.

They open Slack threads and Jira tickets.Arvix proposes and applies the fix — code, config, or compute.

Specialized tools
Single-platform coverage

Snowflake-only. Warehouse-only. Unravel covers Databricks, Snowflake, and BigQuery in one platform.

——— In practice

Three incidents. Same playbook.

The same correlated diagnosis works whether the broken thing is a finance dashboard or an AI training pipeline.